db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kristian Waagan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Assigned: (DERBY-3977) Clob.truncate with a value greater than the Clob length raises different exceptions in embedded and client driver
Date Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:32:44 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Kristian Waagan reassigned DERBY-3977:
--------------------------------------

    Assignee: Kristian Waagan

> Clob.truncate with a value greater than the Clob length raises different exceptions in
embedded and client driver
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3977
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3977
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.3.0, 10.4.2.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>            Assignee: Kristian Waagan
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Calling Clob.truncate with a value that is greater then the Clob length raises different
SQLExceptions in the client and the embedded driver.
>  o Client: SQLState.BLOB_LENGTH_TOO_LONG - XJ079
>  o Embedded: SQLState.BLOB_POSITION_TOO_LARGE - XJ076
> I believe the fix is simple enough  - change one of the exceptions.
> Which one most closely describes the situation?
> A release note is needed for this fix.
> Also note the following from the Java API docs:
> "void truncate(long len)
>               throws SQLException
>     Truncates the CLOB value that this Clob designates to have a length of len characters.
>     Note: If the value specified for pos is greater then the length+1 of the CLOB value
then the behavior is undefined. Some JDBC drivers may throw a SQLException while other drivers
may support this operation.
> "
> This opens for a change of behavior as well.
> There seems to an inconsistency in the docs, possibly due to rephrasing - it references
both len and pos. The latter isn't used anywhere else in the JavaDoc for truncate.
> And what should the result of truncate(length+1) be?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message