Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <389028600.1227027464607.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:57:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1465) NetworkServerControl.start() should
 throw an exception and not just  print  exceptions  if the server fails to
 start
In-Reply-To: <20510964.1151587050017.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12648649#action_12648649 ] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1465:
---------------------------------------

Applications may have only been expecting exceptions when they ping the server to see if it is is up, not from start() since start would always succeed before.  Applications need to be prepared for an exception to be thrown from start().


> NetworkServerControl.start() should throw an exception and not just  print  exceptions  if the server fails to start
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1465
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.2.1
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY-1465.diff3, DERBY-1465_diff.txt, DERBY-1465_diff.txt, DERBY-1465_stat.txt, DERBY-1465_stat.txt, releaseNote.html
>
>
> NetworkServerControl.start()  will not throw an exception  if another server is already running on the same port.    I am not sure but think perhaps this was changed at  one point to accomodate the derby.drda.startNetworkServer property  so that the embedded server could continue to boot even if the network server failed to start, but  I think this is wrong for normal usage.
> http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-Network-Server-API-Behavior-p5055814.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.