Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41163 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2008 16:54:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2008 16:54:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 95900 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2008 16:54:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 95699 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2008 16:54:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 95688 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2008 16:54:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:54:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of m.v.lunteren@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:53:27 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g16so53859nfd.15 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OBwP1cCxz04mBzfuMy5x8HqVYpsYXsSPO7qkTydya2U=; b=ljivr3QHzM6d57T5SeYC/rTC1scJJk0bbrSEgxxsRlebZ8Z7ZmpsQPd45dFDKstxPl ZOnJfQFGKcPz0OM0hi7HzWFW68ddmLoztqH0CCSH1ZLbG0XQXk4OdZhvb9dzCNxfV1sO PpQjPhwamJe3kZw81FetbpyIp9ab5yU6r8ys8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=IxgbjGSF39bKrRyxjS+D5zCVJXxvfecuE1k5czcsNhS70vwl3OwLEnMa2gGHCT6/jC ww/fGpBmmRnucyJ46yzq+J1iCZVAsDT+hfNIJndmNgk686B7aL+ws1Pa2fgrbs1bErXZ O1/EKFaoKkeFV8NSSx+RbRXx/CNSS8vw8vk7s= Received: by 10.210.67.4 with SMTP id p4mr5054782eba.58.1225299237457; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.66.10 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:57 -0700 From: "Myrna van Lunteren" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: bay area derby lunch In-Reply-To: <49086FA9.8080702@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4902128E.9010307@sun.com> <49086FA9.8080702@sun.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote: > Rick Hillegas wrote: >> >> It's been a long time since we've had a group lunch. Would anyone be >> interested in a San Francisco lunch the week after Apache Con? I recall that >> Wednesdays work best for people in the bay area. How about Wednesday >> November 12? >> >> Cheers, >> -Rick > > So far only Bryan and I have expressed interest in this lunch. > > 1) Is this a bad time for a group lunch? > > 2) Are people tired of the lunch format and/or tired of meeting in San > Francisco? Would more people be interested in beer some evening after work > at, say, Pacific Coast Brewery in Oakland? > > Regards, > -Rick > Hi Rick, Apologies, I meant to respond and then it just completely slipped my mind. November 12 is fine for lunch in S.F. for me. I could do either lunch, or evening format. As I don't drink beer, I am leaning toward lunch (in S.F.) but I see the charm of variety...(and luckily, PCB serves other stuff too)... Myrna