Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <1319811539.1213705305100.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Kristian Waagan (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Resolved: (DERBY-3707) STATUS file changes June 2008
In-Reply-To: <2020008833.1212589305224.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kristian Waagan resolved DERBY-3707.
------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

No feedback from community on point 5, so I'm leaving it as it is.

> STATUS file changes June 2008
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3707
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3707
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>            Assignee: Kristian Waagan
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: derby-3707-1a_releases.diff
>
>
> I posted the following mail to derby-dev, see full thread here: http://www.nabble.com/Changes-to-the-STATUS-file-td17617479.html
> - - - - - - - -
> Hello,
> I was looking at the STATUS file we have in the SVN repository, and I
> would like to suggest the following changes:
>  1) Add the 10.3.3.0 release to the release list.
>  2) Mismatch between release date for 10.4.1.3.
>     The STATUS file says it was release on the 26th of April, whereas
>     the download page says the 24th of April.
>     BTW: Was there ever an [ANNOUNCE] mail for this release?
>  3) Specify the dates in the release list using the international
>     standard date notation (YYYY-MM-DD). See:
>       http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
>       http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/iso-date
>       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
>  4) Indent the list of committers in a consistent way.
>  5) Clarify what the sentence below means, and possibly remove it.
>     "The Derby sub-project's modules will be available as distinct and
>     discrete downloads".
>  6) Remove extra dot character.
>     "full-fledged Apache DB project.."
> If the feedback for these changes are positive, I can create a Jira and
> attach some patches for review. I guess change 1 has to go in anyway.
> It is not entirely clear to my how often the STATUS file should be
> updated, or if there is anyone who is more responsible than the
> community in general to do it.
> thanks,
> -- 
> Kristian 
> - - - - - - - -
> There won't be patches attached for all commits, please consult the "Subversion commits" tab as well.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.