Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <1658359209.1207552824259.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 00:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3596) Creation of logical connections from
 a pooled connection causes resource leak on the server
In-Reply-To: <1878506709.1207318404518.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12586257#action_12586257 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-3596:
-------------------------------------------

Sorry, I didn't notice that setAutoCommit(false) was commented out, so this is probably not the same issue as DERBY-3319.

> Creation of logical connections from a pooled connection causes resource leak on the server
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3596
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3596
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client, Network Server, Performance
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.2.1, 10.4.1.0, 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>         Attachments: ConnectionPoolingBug.java
>
>
> When using ClientConnectionPoolDataSource and connection pooling, a new connection / transaction is created for every new logical connection, and the resources are not freed / cleaned up in the server. They are not even cleaned up when the physical connection (ClientPooledConnection) is closed.
> A logical connection is obtained by invoking ClientPooledConnection.getConnection().
> I have observed that if you run the repro enough times against the same server, the number of transaction in the transaction table will be reduced now and then. I believe this is garbage collection, but I have not investigated the problem enough to tell for sure what's going on.
> I have also seen some locks not being freed, causing timeouts in some applications. I don't have a repro for the lock problem at this time, but it is very likely related to this issue.
> Note that XA connections are handled differently on the server, and do probably not have this problem.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.