db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dyre.Tjeldv...@Sun.COM
Subject Re: some comments on the 10.4 beta distribution
Date Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:42:02 GMT
Kim Haase <Camilla.Haase@Sun.COM> writes:

> Good catches, Rick. Should there be a a JIRA issue for this? Or
> perhaps more than one? I think only the first two are specific to the
> docs. Also, which NOTICE are we talking about? The one in the code
> trunk seems to have been updated, and the one in the docs trunk
> doesn't have a copyright notice.

I'm wondering how much of this is covered by step 1 under 
'Check-ins just before generating release artifacts' in the relase
instructions on the Wiki:


I didn't do that for the beta, since it is listed as something you do
when creating the release candidate. But I guess those files might as well have
been updated right after cutting the branch... (and possibly updated

> Kim
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> I have downloaded the source distribution of the 10.4 beta and have
>> a couple comments. After unpacking this distribution, I was able to
>> build the docs and I was able to generate a release. The links from
>> index.html worked. So the structure of the beta looks good to
>> me. The release notes looked sketchy, but I've already sent mail
>> about that. In addition, the following looked odd:
>> o In the user guides, should "Copyright 2004-2007" be changed to
>> "Copyright 2004-2008"?
>> o The version number in the user documentation is 10.3, not 10.4
>> o In the JDBC3 public api, there's a spurious line just before the
>> title of the top-left frame. The line reads: 'Apache Derby 10.4 API
>> Documentation">'
>> o The NOTICE file says "Copyright 2004-2007". Should that be changed
>> to "Copyright 2004-2008"?
>> Thanks,
>> -Rick


View raw message