db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-3651) Current DataTypeDescriptor.comparable() is subset of SQL spec. Enhance it to fully implement SQL spec
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:21:56 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-3651:
-----------------------------------

    Description: 
Collation functionality(DERBY-1478) was implemented in 10.3 The functionality in 10.3 and
10.4 currently has DataTypeDescriptor.comparable() implement subset of SQL standard. More
info on this can be found in DERBY-2876 and other related task is DERBY-2875.

The current implementation of comparable requires that collation type *and* derivation must
match for the types to be comparable. According to SQL Standard 9.13, e.g. with non-matching
types and one derivation of implicit and one of none, then the types are comparable.

  was:
Collation functionality was implemented in 10.3 The functionality in 10.3 and 10.4 currently
has DataTypeDescriptor.comparable() implement subset of SQL standard. More info on this can
be found in DERBY-2876 and other related task is DERBY-2875.

The current implementation of comparable requires that collation type *and* derivation must
match for the types to be comparable. According to SQL Standard 9.13, e.g. with non-matching
types and one derivation of implicit and one of none, then the types are comparable.


> Current DataTypeDescriptor.comparable() is subset of SQL spec. Enhance it to fully implement
SQL spec
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3651
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>
> Collation functionality(DERBY-1478) was implemented in 10.3 The functionality in 10.3
and 10.4 currently has DataTypeDescriptor.comparable() implement subset of SQL standard. More
info on this can be found in DERBY-2876 and other related task is DERBY-2875.
> The current implementation of comparable requires that collation type *and* derivation
must match for the types to be comparable. According to SQL Standard 9.13, e.g. with non-matching
types and one derivation of implicit and one of none, then the types are comparable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message