Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4014 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2008 02:17:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2008 02:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 32211 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2008 02:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 32173 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2008 02:17:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 32164 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2008 02:17:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcintyre.a@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.173] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:16:52 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so783870wfg.13 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=UzmfG5eFnIVoqgBV/TNDCghK3gmJNQS/90kuTydr5UA=; b=rQtJQ+BM4eiQQEB/fkExujhEu0XCRZKeY11rUzyxqSikiZUCssXLQKx5rmA3XGwWWapQJESWlW9WgKphG6u2BkjY/YMxGRk0flBkkQbRb4SQ0U3JJxZjL8pFjm0wjIOuDUbyWND4SuT4/Xxx3ID8+PKQ6VDxjY/atCi60A+ZLVo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Z2YO1TLriqGgF+PzOozYWh0FQbQPwUEPs0Rt/ND841HbcAgZpQHhoXtj9mbd5aGCRdTTxKRV51sryfsGv/Jo8KS3uzXNYK+f+DCRex/jG1Ct+q8HGkB+eg2ps5eOOslggaWnq3DAoDxEYiT1pAFsd6IO3km5ta8a9pIdF9oUtMY= Received: by 10.142.141.21 with SMTP id o21mr819122wfd.56.1205979423812; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.3.16 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54ac72d70803191917g4d11ace6i28794ada5818ed40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:03 -0700 From: "Andrew McIntyre" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Latest javadoc not on web-site In-Reply-To: <47D84A86.3070005@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47D82590.7020607@apache.org> <47D82906.1040604@sun.com> <54ac72d70803121329k1ccdf399ve58d48e411a2d77c@mail.gmail.com> <47D84A86.3070005@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've now fixed a permissions problem with the files on people.a.o and updated the files again. The dev doc and javadoc should now be up to date. On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > I think we need to move away from this model, having an individual > updating the Derby web-site in a manner that's impossible for other > community members to get involved to fix or improve it. > > Having ones own setup and pointing to it from the Derby site (like the > Sun & IBM test runs) seems ok, on-site content seems not. It doesn't bother me, personally, though I agree it is not ideal. If someone who was maintaining the nightly build of the docs simply stopped maintaining them and didn't respond on-list to prodding, someone else could just pick it up and start pushing their build to people.a.o. > The solaris zones sound like the best approach. +1 andrew