Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21507 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2008 17:36:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2008 17:36:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 66448 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2008 17:36:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66285 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2008 17:36:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66276 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2008 17:36:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:36:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.82.107.6] (HELO red.amberpoint.com) (63.82.107.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:18 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bp-laptop.edgility.com [10.10.12.221]) by red.amberpoint.com (8.14.0/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2KHaPsd006162 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47E2A099.40401@amberpoint.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:36:25 -0700 From: Bryan Pendleton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: 10.3 build environment problem References: <47E28AF9.1050006@amberpoint.com> <47E29014.5000801@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <47E29014.5000801@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > had to have jdk16 set. I see now that it is set up so that JDBC4 > classes just don't build if you don't have jdk16 set. You can work > around the problem by setting > jdk16= in your ant.properties, but I wonder which of the > following options I should pursue: Thanks Kathey! For now that workaround works for me. I don't have any immediate plans to do a lot more work on 10.3, so I don't have much of an opinion about the options you proposed. thanks, bryan