db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-3494) Move the setup of NormalizeResultSetNode into the NormalizeResultSetNode
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:28:46 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-3494:

    Derby Info: [Patch Available]

> Move the setup of NormalizeResultSetNode into the NormalizeResultSetNode
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-3494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3494
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: d3494_npe_writeup.html, d3494_npe_writeup.html, decompile.out, derby-3494_remove_genNormalizeResultSetNode_diff.txt,
> In DERBY-3310 Dan suggested ...
> Setting up a NormalizeResultSetNode is spread over three locations, the class itself
(very little, it's almost acting like a C struct),
> the genNormalizeResultSetNode method and then copyLengthsAndTypesToSource. A good O-O
implementation would have
> the logic to create a NormalizeResultSetNode self-contained in NormalizeResultSetNode.
> Since the ResultColumnList of the original ResultSetNode correctly describes the desired
outcome, it's not clear to
> me why NormalizeResultSetNode can't just refer to the same list and use it for its processing.
They may be some chance
> that this would cause recursion at some point, where a NormalizeResultSetNode would think
it needed to be wrapped
> in a NormalizeResultSetNode since the types of its columns and expression don't match
(i.e. when it is handled as a regular ResultSetNode).
> I think moving the setup of a NormalizeResultSetNode into the class itself, so that its
inputs are just the ResultSetNode to wrap
> would help clear up the code, especially if comments were added indicating why certain
actions were being taken.
> I am separating this task out into a separate issue, so that it can be worked on independently
of DERBY-3310.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message