Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <385991460.1204260891084.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:54:51 -0800 (PST)
From: "Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges
In-Reply-To: <5831879.1164211141923.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12573591#action_12573591 ] 

Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-2109:
-------------------------------------------

suites.All (not using any ant target) with my JSR169 implementation with patch 102 installed (and merged with latest changes from trunk) results in 102 failures out of 2697...

101 of those are because of String.split, for example,  here is the stack trace from lang.TimeHandlingTest:
--------------------
org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.lang.TimeHandlingTestjava.sql.SQLException: Java exception: 'java/lang/String.split(Ljava/lang/String;)[Ljava/lang/String;: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError'.
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory.java:45)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Util.java:88)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.javaException(Util.java:245)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.wrapInSQLException(TransactionResourceImpl.java:403)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.handleException(TransactionResourceImpl.java:346)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.handleException(EmbedConnection.java:2023)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.<init>(EmbedConnection.java:511)
	at org.apache.derby.jdbc.Driver169.getNewEmbedConnection(Driver169.java:60)
	at org.apache.derby.jdbc.InternalDriver.connect(InternalDriver.java:237)
	at org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource.getConnection(EmbeddedSimpleDataSource.java:406)
	at org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource.getConnection(EmbeddedSimpleDataSource.java:373)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.DataSourceConnector.openConnection(DataSourceConnector.java:67)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.TestConfiguration.openDefaultConnection(TestConfiguration.java:1312)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseJDBCTestSetup.getConnection(BaseJDBCTestSetup.java:72)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.CleanDatabaseTestSetup.setUp(CleanDatabaseTestSetup.java:104)
	at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:18)
	at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestSetup.run(BaseTestSetup.java:57)
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java/lang/String.split(Ljava/lang/String;)[Ljava/lang/String;
	at org.apache.derby.security.DatabasePermission.initActions(DatabasePermission.java:237)
	at org.apache.derby.security.DatabasePermission.<init>(DatabasePermission.java:210)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkDatabaseCreatePrivileges(EmbedConnection.java:2326)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.createDatabase(EmbedConnection.java:2261)
	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.<init>(EmbedConnection.java:354)
	... 21 more
--------------------

The last failure is different - I think it ok if this one test gets excluded from the unitTests suite for JSR169.


--------------------
102) testSystemPrivileges(org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest)java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.security.auth.Subject
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest$RunAsPrivilegedUserAction.run(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:640)
	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:191)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.execute(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:477)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.checkSystemPermission(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:268)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.execute(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:190)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.testSystemPrivileges(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:180)
	at java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.invokeV(AccessibleObject.java:205)
	at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestCase.runBare(BaseTestCase.java:101)
	at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
	at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
	at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
--------------------


> System privileges
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Security
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Martin Zaun
>         Attachments: DERBY-2109-02.diff, DERBY-2109-02.stat, derby-2109-03-javadoc-see-tags.diff, DERBY-2109-04.diff, DERBY-2109-04.stat, DERBY-2109-05and06.diff, DERBY-2109-05and06.stat, DERBY-2109-07.diff, DERBY-2109-07.stat, DERBY-2109-08.diff, DERBY-2109-08.stat, DERBY-2109-08_addendum.diff, DERBY-2109-08_addendum.stat, DERBY-2109-09.diff, DERBY-2109-09.stat, DERBY-2109-10.diff, DERBY-2109-10.stat, DERBY-2109-11.diff, DERBY-2109-11.stat, DERBY-2109-12.diff, DERBY-2109-12.stat, SystemPrivilegesBehaviour.html, systemPrivs.html, systemPrivs.html, systemPrivs.html, systemPrivs.html
>
>
> Add mechanisms for controlling system-level privileges in Derby. See the related email discussion at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/33151.
> The 10.2 GRANT/REVOKE work was a big step forward in making Derby more  secure in a client/server configuration. I'd like to plug more client/server security holes in 10.3. In particular, I'd like to focus on  authorization issues which the ANSI spec doesn't address.
> Here are the important issues which came out of the email discussion.
> Missing privileges that are above the level of a single database:
> - Create Database
> - Shutdown all databases
> - Shutdown System
> Missing privileges specific to a particular database:
> - Shutdown that Database
> - Encrypt that database
> - Upgrade database
> - Create (in that Database) Java Plugins (currently  Functions/Procedures, but someday Aggregates and VTIs)
> Note that 10.2 gave us GRANT/REVOKE control over the following  database-specific issues, via granting execute privilege to system  procedures:
> Jar Handling
> Backup Routines
> Admin Routines
> Import/Export
> Property Handling
> Check Table
> In addition, since 10.0, the privilege of connecting to a database has been controlled by two properties (derby.database.fullAccessUsers and derby.database.defaultConnectionMode) as described in the security section of the Developer's Guide (see http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.2/devguide/cdevcsecure865818.html).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.