Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <20025768.1201887669088.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:41:09 -0800 (PST)
From: "A B (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-3376) Test case in GrantRevokeDDLTest looks
 to be accidentally commented out...
In-Reply-To: <19557761.1201887668722.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

A B updated DERBY-3376:
-----------------------

    Component/s: Test

> Test case in GrantRevokeDDLTest looks to be accidentally commented out...
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3376
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
>            Reporter: A B
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In lang/GrantRevokeDDLTest.java, beginning at line 8057 (at time of writing), there looks to be a test case that was inadvertently commented out:
>         // set connection user1
>         //ij(USER3)> -- test multiple FKs DERBY-1589?set
>         // connection user1drop table user3.rt3drop table
>         // user2.rt2drop table user1.rt1create table rt1 (c1 int
>         // primary key not null, c2 int)insert into rt1 values
>         // (1,1), (2,2)grant references on rt1 to PUBLIC, user2,
>         // user3set connection user2 XJ001 occurred at create table
>         // rt2...create table rt2 (c1 int primary key not null,
>         // constraint rt2fk foreign key(c1) references
>         // user1.rt1)insert into rt2 values (1), (2)grant
>         // references on rt2 to PUBLIC, user3set connection
>         // user3create table rt3 (c1 int primary key not null,
>         // constraint rt3fk1 foreign key(c1) references
>         // user1.rt1,   constraint rt3fk2 foreign key(c1) references
>         // user1.rt2)insert into rt3 values (1), (2)set connection
>         // user1 rt3fk1 should get dropped.revoke references on rt1
>         // from PUBLICrevoke references on rt1 from user3set
>         // connection user2revoke references on rt2 from PUBLIC
>         // expect errorinsert into rt2 values (3)set connection
>         // user3 expect error, use user3 references privilege,
>         // rt3fk2 still in effectinsert into rt3 values (3)set
>         // connection user2revoke references on rt2 from user3set
>         // connection user3 ok, rt3fk2 should be dropped.insert
>         // into rt3 values (3)
> Based on the format of the comment, my guess is that this JUnit test was created using the conversion script attached to DERBY-2151, and that the script somehow messed up the conversion.
> The first line of the comment mentions DERBY-1589, but a) there is a question mark after it, and b) the commit for that issue does not appear to include the aforementioned lines.
> If the test case is _supposed_ to be commented out, then some explanatory comments explaining why might be nice...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.