db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Narayanan <V.Naraya...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Opinions please - some questions regarding replication
Date Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:39:01 GMT
Jørgen Løland wrote:
> 3. It is possible to make a separate jar for replication if we solve 
> some sealing issues (Dan, Narayanan), but with only 65K of 
> uncompressed class files it may not be worth it (Rick, Jørgen). *Not 
> concluded yet.*
There are no sealing issues. I saw it wrongly. I guess the thread 
concluded by saying sealing is not an issue.

But if this is not a generic replication implementation that would not 
be usable by someone who say might
be working on a pluggable storage architecture for Derby I do not see 
why it should not be tied to the store
and remain in derby.jar. Also I agree that it is not excessive bloat.

View raw message