db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3304) Explicit commit inside a java procedure makes a dynamic result sets passed out unavailable
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:47:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565649#action_12565649
] 

Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-3304:
----------------------------------------

I agree that Activation.reset should be able to just close the resultset associated with it
without having to look at holdability or returnsRows() method. This functionality of looking
at holdability and returnsRows should be implemented separately. I will work on cleaning up
code for Activation.reset and putting the functionality required by commit in the appropriate
method.

> Explicit commit inside a java procedure makes a dynamic result sets passed out unavailable
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3304
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3304
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Attachments: Main.java
>
>
> Repro (Main.java) that shows changed behavior after svn 602991
> (the patch committed for this issue). It seems a regression: (originally from Dag H.
Wanvik attached to DERBY-1585)
> An explicit commit inside a stored procedure makes a dynamic result sets passed out unavailable,
even if the commit is executed *prior* to the result set; as in the repro.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message