db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3378) Derby's timer thread should have a name that identifies it as belong to a derby instance
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:39:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12570771#action_12570771
] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-3378:
----------------------------------------------

I applied the patch but it fails to compile for me. Turns out the Timer constructors that
take a name were only added in JDK 1.5 and so do not compile with JDK 1.4 and J2ME/CDC/Foundation
which Derby still supports.

A specific implementation of the TimerFactory could be added for JDK 1.5 (that used new Timer("derby.timer",
...)) but I'm not sure it's worth it.

Sorry, I didn't realize that the constructor was new to JDK 1.5.

> Derby's timer thread should have a name that identifies it as belong to a derby instance
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3378
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3378
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Newcomer, Services
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY-3378.diff
>
>
> Looking at the threads with jconsole when derby is running shows derby's timer thread
as Timer-0.
> All other derby threads are given a name starting with 'derby.', would be useful if the
same was true for the timer thread.
> In SingletonTimerFactory just use the Timer constructor that takes a name.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message