Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13085 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 15:16:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2008 15:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 49154 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 15:16:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 49127 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 15:16:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 49118 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2008 15:16:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:16:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.82.107.6] (HELO red.amberpoint.com) (63.82.107.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:16:07 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bp-laptop.edgility.com [10.10.12.159]) by red.amberpoint.com (8.14.0/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0OFGBgH006144 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:16:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4798ABBA.30202@amberpoint.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:16:10 -0800 From: Bryan Pendleton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: [Running] Top-level junit tests - WAS Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3316) Leak in client if ResultSet not closed References: <31292034.1200065254191.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <8214649.1200588814996.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <47914498.3060405@apache.org> <47988C39.2020506@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <47988C39.2020506@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > misconception. Apparently "ant junit-all" runs some tests that are not > run by "junit suites.All", and I also think "junit suites.All" runs some > tests that are not run by "ant junit-all". I, too, thought these ran the same tests. Do you have a list of the test differences between the two runs? Also, I have been routinely using "ant junitreport"; which set of tests is that running? thanks, bryan