Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16226 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2008 18:16:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2008 18:16:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 58828 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2008 18:16:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 58692 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2008 18:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 58683 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2008 18:16:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:16:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.64.91] (HELO smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.64.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:15:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 54275 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2008 18:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.254.144?) (ddebrunner@sbcglobal.net@75.24.108.32 with plain) by smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2008 18:15:48 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: asTWzjgVM1kul9t7VqKCssFgCntQvHZ0Binhr49CCp2Quy0s Message-ID: <478660D5.8000504@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:15:49 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Looking towards 10.4 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote: > Unless someone else volunteers to replace Bernt, I am prepared to > take over as the next release manager, but on the condition that we > can delay feature freeze to the March 1st time frame, A release manager is all powerful, so if you want to be release manager you get to set your own date for the release. So thanks for offering and please do! Dan.