Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10747 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2008 09:31:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2008 09:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 29804 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2008 09:31:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 29754 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2008 09:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 29743 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2008 09:31:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:31:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:31:44 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F119271425F for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:31:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26512061.1200389495984.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:31:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3316) Leak in client if ResultSet not closed In-Reply-To: <31292034.1200065254191.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558991#action_12558991 ] Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-3316: ------------------------------------------- Doesn't the Hashtable still leak with the patch? It allows the ResultSet objects to be freed, but the Hashtable doesn't remove the empty WeakReference objects, so it will still grow, I think. It seems like you planned to add a comment to mapCursorNameToResultSet() but forgot to finish it. > Leak in client if ResultSet not closed > -------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-3316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3316 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Network Client > Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.3.2.1, 10.4.0.0 > Reporter: Kathey Marsden > Assignee: Kathey Marsden > Attachments: derby-3316_diff.txt, RepeatStatement.java > > > If I run the attached program RepeatStatement.java with 32M of heap, > I will get an OutOfMemory error in the client. > java -Xmx32M RepeatStatement > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space > at org.apache.derby.client.am.Cursor.allocateCharBuffer(Cursor.java:1260) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.parseSQLDTARDarray(NetStatementReply.java:1356) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.parseQRYDSC(NetStatementReply.java:1207) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.parseOpenQuery(NetStatementReply.java:479) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.parseOPNQRYreply(NetStatementReply.java:223) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.readOpenQuery(NetStatementReply.java:64) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.StatementReply.readOpenQuery(StatementReply.java:50) > at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatement.readOpenQuery_(NetStatement.java:153) > at org.apache.derby.client.am.Statement.readOpenQuery(Statement.java:1396) > at org.apache.derby.client.am.Statement.flowExecute(Statement.java:2001) > at org.apache.derby.client.am.Statement.executeQueryX(Statement.java:421) > at org.apache.derby.client.am.Statement.executeQuery(Statement.java:406) > at RepeatStatement.testInsertAndSelect(RepeatStatement.java:31) > at RepeatStatement.main(RepeatStatement.java:10) > If I close the ResultSet or Statement it does not leak. > This occurs on trunk and 10.2.1.6. It does however not run out of memory on 10.1.3.1, so appears to be a regression. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.