Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <4461252.1196688165132.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 05:22:45 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3198) Using setQueryTimeout will leak
 sections
In-Reply-To: <12216627.1194818090723.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547837 ] 

Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-3198:
---------------------------------------

Well, it seemed safer to verify that Sections aren't leaked even when relying on implicit close. I could add a comment about that I suppose.

> Using setQueryTimeout will leak sections 
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3198
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3198
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC, Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4
>            Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll
>            Assignee: Dyre Tjeldvoll
>         Attachments: derby-3198.v1.diff, derby-3198.v2.diff, derby-3198.v3.diff, repro.diff
>
>
> The implementation of setQueryTimeout relies on NetStatementReply.writeSetSpecialRegister() which will allocate a dynamic section when called. No reference to this Section object is kept, and so Section.free() never gets called on it. Executing the same statment repeatedly with a query timeout set results in the client driver throwing an exception because the number of Sections exceeding 32000.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.