Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8709 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2007 21:45:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2007 21:45:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 58565 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2007 21:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 58531 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2007 21:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 58522 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2007 21:45:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:45:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msatoor@gmail.com designates 209.85.162.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.162.183] (HELO el-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.162.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:45:20 +0000 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id s27so506513ele for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:44:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=ZlVifTBfUTI9nrGclQndE3SV6/RrM0Y0kMecAWxtqzk=; b=gMZqA9QD9JacOI1bN7WWMXkLoFd2QT/PqVmWRMAgJ6nkc1buQH1sGNqbBma41HuU997aOVOh8qtvMmYQ522nKpmhDqmYDL6iM/5cc81r59nGIrOKKlrUF/XL8LWHWJ81gL4PY5oCNfk3AU2HZPhhJiOrxE3GrW0RC5/tlA8KAKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=KtRI2SxVn0vjQ+TV3onoT4rv908h32nWyb0bXBfyI2gBYRCAwvQ0q7wqQFvAOGUA8EriH4DPMlOle31YY0q/7iP1bPUo5wE+qPYmUJhUcaj0ILI5B2peblIUd4Qw3VUXDl2xSuw7f41WydQe361lYr1o3mn2qy0RyReYMG84UyY= Received: by 10.142.99.21 with SMTP id w21mr1878784wfb.1194385498475; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.224.14 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:44:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:44:58 -0800 From: "Mamta Satoor" To: "Derby Development" Subject: Fix in version 10.3.1.5 vs 10.3.2.0? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, When I commit a change into 10.3 codeline, what should I use for fixin version ie 10.3.1.5 or 10.3.2.0? I made the decision to choose 10.3.1.5 for DERBY-3178 because that is what sysinfo showed me. Is that assumption correct? If yes, then what is the purpose of 10.3.2.0? I hope this is not a topic that was discussed already and I managed to miss the discussion. thanks, Mamta