Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <23067219.1195511982997.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:39:42 -0800 (PST)
From: "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-3211) Convert derbynet/NSinSameJVM.java to
 junit
In-Reply-To: <4895468.1195241863205.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543714 ] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-3211:
----------------------------------------------

This is because your test *and* policy file is using a different *host* (0.0.0.0), not because it's using a different port number.

The policy file already handles a settable host file using derbyTesting.serverhost, I wonder though if this test should just use the default host (a different port number is fine) and not specifically 0.0.0.0. In special testing of 0.0.0.0 is needed then it probably should be set at a test configuration level and not hard-coded within a test.


> Convert derbynet/NSinSameJVM.java to junit
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3211
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Manjula Kutty
>            Assignee: Manjula Kutty
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY-3211_diff_11_16.txt, DERBY-3211_diff_11_19.txt, DERBY-3211_stat_11_16.txt, DERBY-3211_stat_11_19.txt
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.