Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <15287996.1195169623064.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:33:43 -0800 (PST)
From: "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2564)
 ContextService.notifyAllActiveThreads() needs a privileged block around the
 call to Thread.interrupt()
In-Reply-To: <32762245.1176913515284.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542909 ] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-2564:
---------------------------------------

So I guess in summary we do need a privilege block, but we don't need to modify our template policy file for this issue.  Is that correct?


> ContextService.notifyAllActiveThreads() needs a privileged block around the call to Thread.interrupt()
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2564
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Security
>    Affects Versions: 10.0.2.0, 10.0.2.1, 10.1.1.0, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>
> It looks to me as though the call to interrupt() can raise a SecurityException. I think this may give rise to another permission that we need to add to our template policy file and to our security documentation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.