db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-3114) Harmonize sql state thrown when closing a connection with pending transaction between net end embedded drivers
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:42:51 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-3114:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: Main.java

attaching repro

> Harmonize sql state thrown when closing a connection with pending transaction between
net end embedded drivers
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3114
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3114
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Main.java
>
>
> * Embedded (thrown from EmbedConnection#close):
>   State: 25000 (LANG_INVALID_TRANSACTION_STATE)
>   Text in English locale: "Invalid transaction state."
> * Network client (thrown from Connection#checkForTransactionInProgress)
>   State: 25001 (CANNOT_CLOSE_ACTIVE_CONNECTION)
>   Text in English locale: "Cannot close a connection while a transaction is still active."
> I don't see why these should differ between the drivers. The network client
> error message is more explanatory, I think. 
> The standard says about disconnect statement, section 17.3, general
> rule 6: If any SQL-connection in L is active, then an exception
> condition is raised: invalid transaction state - active SQL-transaction.
> According to section 23.1 SQLSTATE (p.1075):
> Subcondition: Active SQL transaction
> subclass: 001
> so, in this case, so it would appear that the use of 25001 is correct,
> not 25000. I suggest we change embedded to use 25001 also, and release
> note it, since it has application impact.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message