Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46328 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2007 23:51:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2007 23:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 99819 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2007 23:51:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 99780 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2007 23:51:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 99771 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2007 23:51:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:51:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.153] (HELO e35.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:53:37 +0000 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8ONos0i007777 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:50:54 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l8ONos9P407326 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:50:54 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8ONosgL012904 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:50:54 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (IBM-7DEEBD4F66E.usca.ibm.com [9.72.134.62]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l8ONorJs012852 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:50:54 -0600 Message-ID: <46F84DA8.7030202@sbcglobal.net> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:52:08 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Requiring Java 5 compiler References: <46EEA838.808@sun.com> <46F4079B.8070000@sun.com> <46F46A49.5090200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46F46A49.5090200@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Stanley Bradbury wrote: > I am concerned that this proposal includes dropping support for J2ME > from Derby. I would like to see a standard vote if this does mean > dropping the J2ME platform. IMHO it would also be good to poll the > User community specifically about the use of J2ME to determine if such > a change will leave some applications without an upgrade path. Rick could you clarify this. I had thought that that we would still support J2ME and jdk 1.4.2 and that this is a change that would only affect developers building Derby, not users running Derby. Is that correct? Thanks Kathey