Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57588 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 06:28:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 06:28:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 46479 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2007 04:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46449 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2007 04:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46216 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2007 04:28:28 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:28:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:28:25 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDBB7141EB for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24042024.1183696084552.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:28:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (DERBY-2777) Parameters should take their collation from the context in which they are getting used rather than the current compilation schema In-Reply-To: <9804682.1181241205852.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mamta A. Satoor reopened DERBY-2777: ------------------------------------ I think I have found one last piece of code where the ? is not picking up the correct collation and that node is TernaryOperatorNode. Very soon, I will check in a fix for TRIM and then I will check other functions implemented in that code. > Parameters should take their collation from the context in which they are getting used rather than the current compilation schema > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-2777 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2777 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Bug > Components: SQL > Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0 > Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor > Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor > Fix For: 10.3.1.1, 10.4.0.0 > > > With revision 542646, changes were made so that parameters will take their collation from current compilation schema. But based on the following thread http://www.nabble.com/Collation-and-parameter-markers-(-)-tf3866040.html , using the collation from the context would be the correct thing to do for the parameters. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.