db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2656) Run suites.All against a collated database
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:19:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515792
] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2656:
----------------------------------------------

> Would it make more sense for these tests to have a suiteForCollation() that is a subset
of tests (the ones that failed) and run embedded only? 

I would think not, the fixtures that passed were probably also testing collation but didn't
surface any bugs, ie everything was functioning correctly.
Keeping all of the fixtures would ensure no regressions in the future.

I agree though that running only embedded makes sense.

> Run suites.All against a collated database
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2656
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.3.1.2
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-2656_diff.txt, FullCollation.out, FullCollationTests_out.txt
>
>
> It would be good to leverage the existing tests to exercise the collation code.  Investigate
running all the tests against a collated database.
> Kathey

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message