I agree this 2931 should be a blocker, it a bad soft upgrade issue.
As I said in the issue I am actively working on it. I have a fix
coded and am running upgrade tests now.
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Myrna van Lunteren <m.v.lunteren@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> You may have noticed that 2 blockers have shown up -
>> DERBY-2923 and DERBY-2924.
>> I'll wait for these to be fixed, adjust the release notes, patch for
>> DERBY-2915, and generate a new candidate thereafter. I'll update the
>> wiki when things become more clear.
>
> Hi Myrna,
>
> I have also raised the priority of DERBY-2931 to blocker since it makes
> it impossible to access tables created in soft upgrade mode after a
> reboot of the database. That is, the tables are accessible if you
> downgrade, but they are not accessible in 10.3 (even after a hard
> upgrade).
>
|