db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2656) Run suites.All against a collated database
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:40:03 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515770
] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-2656:
---------------------------------------

Adding these tests to CollationTest adds about 10 minutes to suites.All
 suite.addTest(BatchUpdateTest.suite());
      suite.addTest(GroupByExpressionTest.suite());
      suite.addTest(UpdatableResultSetTest.suite());

Would it make more sense for these tests to have a suiteForCollation() that is a subset of
tests (the ones that failed) and run embedded only?

Kathey


> Run suites.All against a collated database
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2656
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.3.1.2
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-2656_diff.txt, FullCollation.out, FullCollationTests_out.txt
>
>
> It would be good to leverage the existing tests to exercise the collation code.  Investigate
running all the tests against a collated database.
> Kathey

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message