db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Øystein Grøvlen (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2388) DOCS - Reorder JDBC Reference section in Ref Manual
Date Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:52:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12507694

Øystein Grøvlen commented on DERBY-2388:

Do we really need to include a JDBC reference section?  Would it not be better to just refer
to the javadoc of the JDBC specification?  In addition, a table showing which methods are
supported and a section calling out any Derby specific issues would be needed.

If we still want to include a JDBC reference section, there should not be different sections
for JDBC 1, 2, 3, and 4.    Everything should be put together in one section, organized as
suggested in this issue.   

> DOCS - Reorder JDBC Reference section in Ref Manual
> ---------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-2388
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2388
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Laura Stewart
>            Priority: Minor
> The JDBC reference section isn't in alphabetical order either. It might make sense to
reorder it to correspond with the javadoc (which separates interfaces, classes, and exceptions
into subgroups and orders them alphabetically). I'd also suggest putting java.sql.Driver.getPropertyInfo
in a subtopic under java.sql.Driver. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message