db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-927) Cleanup code in the monitor to clarify the relationship between StorageFactory and PersistentService
Date Fri, 08 Jun 2007 05:55:26 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502680
] 

Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-927:
------------------------------------------

This issue has not seen any activity since December. Is progress still being made? Does it
need to have the fixin for 10.3?

> Cleanup code in the monitor to clarify the relationship between StorageFactory and PersistentService
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-927
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Services
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Assignee: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
>
> The addition of the StorageFactory code into the BaseMonitor code muddied the water with
respect to what is a service and what is a storage factory.
> Cleanup the code and add comments and/or a package.html to describe what is going on.
> Look at loading the storage factories through the modules.properties rather than the
hard-coded list and thus gain the benefit of the standard module environment
> checking (jvm level and dependent classes) and ensure classes are loaded from modules.properties
consistently.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message