Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76322 invoked from network); 14 May 2007 23:42:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2007 23:42:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 37114 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 23:42:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 36345 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 23:42:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 36294 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2007 23:42:44 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:42:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:42:37 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4DA714068 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23806679.1179186136432.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:42:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1746) upgrade tests should start using 10.1.3 released builds In-Reply-To: <29831617.1156269973828.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495813 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1746: ------------------------------------------- I'm confused. What is 'the existing format' and which are the 'changes discussed' ? I think it would be no great hardship to change scripts for running nightly tests, but I'm missing some info in this bug...Should I be looking at another bu that has the info you mention? Or is there a log of the IRC chat? > upgrade tests should start using 10.1.3 released builds > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-1746 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Test > Components: Test > Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6 > Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren > Priority: Minor > Attachments: DERBY-1746_102_20060823.diff, DERBY-1746_102_20060823.stat, DERBY-1746_trunk_20060824.diff, svn_external > > > The upgrade test' master is based on the 10.1 jars checked in to svn - 10.1.1.0 - (208786). > However, we now have a newer released version of 10.1 - 10.1.3. This would be the obvious choice for someone running tests testing the beta jars. > If the jars are 10.1.3 then a diff will occur because of the fix for DERBY-655: > 703d702 > < ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx, 7 > 2168d2166 > < ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx, 7 > It would be nice if the final build for 10.2 would include an updgrade test master created using 10.1.3, And same is true for the trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.