From derby-dev-return-41346-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Wed May 02 17:08:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80929 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 17:08:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 17:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 75680 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 17:08:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 75655 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 17:08:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 75646 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 17:08:26 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 10:08:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.198.206] (HELO smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 10:08:18 -0700 Received: (qmail 54154 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 17:07:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (ddebrunner@sbcglobal.net@75.24.107.110 with plain) by smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 May 2007 17:07:55 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: HAVwBqIVM1mCd01aa9Oi0BwWyDkaSl3shYcPwnj2WVDcfKaU_g7u0AKNPs_bduGfxUrWrr91Eg-- Message-ID: <4638C522.2060701@apache.org> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:06:42 -0700 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: opinions please on possible existing app impact of DERBY-1828 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Myrna van Lunteren wrote: > Hi, > > In DERBY-1828, Jørgen proposes to adjust some SQLStates in the > authorization area. > I'd like the community's input on the release-related question: > > Jørgen asks: > "Q1) I need your opinion on whether or not this issue can be fixed > before the next major release. I.e., may new error codes cause > problems for existing applications?" I say it's fine to make the change, it's very unlikely existing Derby applications are dependent on the SQL state for a authorization failure. Dan.