db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dag.Wan...@Sun.COM (Dag H. Wanvik)
Subject Re: 10.3 Concern: Need to make DBO restrictions [Derby-2264] optional at upgrade
Date Wed, 30 May 2007 13:35:44 GMT
Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> I vote for this one. Default off for embedded.  I am sorry I did not
> look closely enough at this one and consider the scope of impact. If
> database shutdown for every deployed embedded database in the world
> has to be the database owner,  I fear it would have a large impact.  I

Just to be clear, only databases for which authentication is turned on
are potentially impacted:

http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease#head-39d10a9c64273423f141a7d0e6d1d66b01d491df

That may still be a significant portion...

Dag

> think it would be ok for the default to be on for  network server if
> it is possible to differentiate.
>
> Kathey
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message