db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Myrna van Lunteren" <m.v.lunte...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Regression Test Report - tinderbox_trunk16 538750 - Sun DBTG
Date Thu, 17 May 2007 04:12:02 GMT
On 17 May 2007 01:54:34 -0000, Ole.Solberg@sun.com <Ole.Solberg@sun.com> wrote:
> [Auto-generated mail]
>
> *tinderbox_trunk16* 538750/2007-05-16 23:42:41 CEST
>
> Failed  Tests    OK  Skip  Duration       Suite
> -------------------------------------------------------
> *Jvm: 1.6*
>  SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
>    0    313    313     0    91.34%     derbyall
>    F:69,E:30    8146    8047     0   1626.08%     org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.suites.All
>  Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/testSummary-538750.html
>  Attempted failure analysis in
>                  http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/FailReports/538750_bySig.html
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Changes in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/UpdateInfo/538750.txt
>
> ( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ )
>
>
Looks like the encryption tests are throwing a curveball at the
upgrade tests. I didn't see this - apologies for that. However, some
of the errors are similar to some things I have seen in IBM's nightly
tests, see http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_test_results/main/testlog/ibm15/538396-suites.All_diff.txt
- DERBY-2644.

If anyone has a suggestion, please speak up...

Thx,
Myrna

Mime
View raw message