db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 10.3 Concern: Need to make DBO restrictions [Derby-2264] optional at upgrade
Date Tue, 29 May 2007 16:27:32 GMT
Dag H. Wanvik wrote:
> Hi,
> Stanley Bradbury <Stan.Bradbury@gmail.com> writes:
>> I feel strongly that the restrictions implemented by DERBY-2264 must
>> be tied to sqlAuthorization (or a new property of it's own) being
>> turned on.  The restrictions need to be optional at upgrade otherwise
> I understand your concerns. I addressed the upgrade issue several
> times in the discussion of this issue, but felt the community
> preferred the semantics which are currently implemented, landing on
> the side of a sensible secure-by-default behavior. Options:

Was there any discussion outside of comments in DERBY-2264? I looked in 
the archives but couldn't see any between 2007/02/13 and 2007/02/20. I 
picked that date range because on 02/20 you said in DERBY-2264

  "Right, it seems both Dan and Rick are less concerned than me about the
compatibility here issue, so I rest my case. "

That was the first comment since 02/13, however, I don't see how my 
single comment in DERBY-2264 could lead you to that conclusion, I 
thought it's was just factual about authentication states. I'm sure 
there must have been a discussion elsewhere, but I can't find it at the 


View raw message