db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bryan Pendleton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2603) Minor erratum in page of VARCHAR in Derby Reference manual
Date Thu, 03 May 2007 14:22:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493380
] 

Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-2603:
----------------------------------------

Could you expand on why you think that "binary" should be replaced by "boolean"?

I understand "binary" to describe the number of *arguments* that the operator has.

I understand "boolean" to describe the *result* of the operator.

Thus, to me, the two words are not easily interchangeable, so I'm
interested to understand more about the issue as you see it.

Thanks!

> Minor erratum in page of VARCHAR in Derby Reference manual
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2603
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>         Environment: http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/rrefsqlj41207.html
>            Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I found next statement in the page through translation into Japanese.
> > When binary comparison operators are applied to VARCHARs, the lengths of the operands
are not altered, and spaces at the end of the values are ignored.
> I think "binary" should be replaced as "boolean".
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message