Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71758 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2007 14:22:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2007 14:22:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 29163 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2007 14:22:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 29130 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2007 14:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 29084 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2007 14:22:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:22:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:22:35 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9F071407F for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23261283.1176474135766.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kim Haase (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-2538) Update documentation to describe the expected behavior when a JDBC 4 app creates a JDBC 3 datasource. In-Reply-To: <29355306.1176242132256.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kim Haase updated DERBY-2538: ----------------------------- Attachment: DERBY-2538-3.zip DERBY-2538-3.diff Whoops! Sorry about that. Here is a clean patch, I hope. Thanks for catching that. After reading DERBY-2488, I am wondering if the description of the client DataSource interfaces in the Admin Guide (both cadminnsdatasources.dita and cadminappsxawthdriver.dita) ought to have some version of the following text in rdevresman79556.dita: "If an application is running on the Java SE 6 platform, all connection objects returned from the DataSource will be JDBC 4 connection objects, regardless of which DataSource variant is in use." That is, assuming DERBY-2488 continues in the same direction it seems to be heading. I agree it makes sense to wait on completing this issue till that issue is resolved. > Update documentation to describe the expected behavior when a JDBC 4 app creates a JDBC 3 datasource. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-2538 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2538 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Documentation > Affects Versions: 10.2.2.0, 10.3.0.0 > Reporter: A B > Assigned To: Kim Haase > Priority: Minor > Attachments: cdevresman89722.html, DERBY-2538-2.diff, DERBY-2538-2.zip, DERBY-2538-3.diff, DERBY-2538-3.zip, DERBY-2538.diff, rdevresman79556.html > > > Based on discussion from DERBY-2488, pages in the Developer's Guide should be improved to describe what happens if a JDBC 4 application uses an "old" (JDBC 3) datasource. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.