From derby-dev-return-39953-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Tue Apr 03 14:41:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11512 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 14:41:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 14:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6436 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 14:41:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 6215 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 14:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 6206 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2007 14:41:31 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:41:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.198.202] (HELO smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:41:22 -0700 Received: (qmail 15426 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 14:41:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (ddebrunner@sbcglobal.net@75.24.104.14 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 14:41:00 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ZdZ9xT8VM1nrk2wnZw1._CCuM5GRG1T555gPo3vGFenZBnqsiQ6Dq6gAgLg33CGJHdJkAXoqWO1ieHiza_Awf5Y8BGviWjUGMBRkYasZi5Y86ei6EgsZzvLNVJv.QQ-- Message-ID: <46126750.1010401@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:40:16 -0700 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: some comments on collation wiki page References: <4611F2C0.2040306@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4611F2C0.2040306@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/BuiltInLanguageBasedOrderingDERBY-1478 > 7)For user defined functions' that return character string type, the return type's collation > will have the same collation as current schema's character set. The "current schema's" character set, or the character set of the schema the function is defined in? And if it's the current schema, is it current at function definition time, or current when used? Dan.