db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sunitha Kambhampati (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1001) Rewrite 'store/encryptionKey.sql' to a JUnit test
Date Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:30:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491111

Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-1001:

Each of the tests- EncryptionKeyDESTest  and the EncryptionKeyAESTest require a clean testrun

I ran the EncryptionKeyDESTest and then cleaned up my testrun directory and then ran the AES
test and it worked  OK  in Eclipse as well as on command prompt. I was using 1.4.2 Sun JVM.

kristian> 2) How many encryption algorithms/variations should we test? 
How about  the algorithms that we test in EncryptionSuite.   It would be interesting to see
how much time the tests would take in this case..  

I just took a quick look at the suite() methods in the DES and AES test and was wondering
why they were different..  In one, there is the SupportFilesSetup decorator but in AES test
that is not used..  


> Rewrite 'store/encryptionKey.sql' to a JUnit test
> -------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-1001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1001
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>         Assigned To: Kristian Waagan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: derby-1001-1a-preliminary.diff, derby-1001-1a-preliminary.stat
> This test has failed on Solaris10 for a long time, due to issues with the default security
provider on this OS. See DERBY-788 for details.
> I consider rewriting this test as interresting because it allows us to see how things
can be done in "the JUnit way". 
> 1) Run test with multiple encryption algorithms with minimal test code duplication.
> 2) Special handling of exceptions for specific providers (PCKS11-Solaris).
> The rewritten test might cause some discussion on how we want to handle the issues mentioned

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message