db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "A B (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2538) Update documentation to describe the expected behavior when a JDBC 4 app creates a JDBC 3 datasource.
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:33:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487954
] 

A B commented on DERBY-2538:
----------------------------

> is this just a question of what JDK I'm using?

Great question.  Maybe JDK would in fact be clearer here.  I went with "JDBC" because the
connection objects we are talking about implement (or don't) the JDBC 4 interface methods.
 Use of "jdk 1.6" seemed slightly less appropriate to me because it seems like it could theoretically
be possible to have more than one jdk that correlates to JDBC 4 (ex. jdk 1.4 and 1.5 both
correlate to JDBC 3).

But I am notorious for messing up the JDK/JVM/JDBC terminology, so you're probably right.
 I'll wait to see if anyone out there offers better wording.

> Did we invent the terminology "JDBC environment" or is this part of the JDBC specification?


Another good question.  I just typed what came to me...maybe that's not a good way of phrasing
it.  I did notice that in one of his comment Dan wrote:

  "In a JDK 1.4/1.5 environment the applications must use the old ones (e.g. EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource)"

So perhaps that's the wording that should go here...

> Update documentation to describe the expected behavior when a JDBC 4 app creates a JDBC
3 datasource.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2538
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2538
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.2.0, 10.3.0.0
>            Reporter: A B
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Based on discussion from DERBY-2488, pages in the Developer's Guide should be improved
to describe what happens if a JDBC 4 application uses an "old" (JDBC 3) datasource.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message