Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <7352308.1173174084489.JavaMail.root@brutus>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:41:24 -0800 (PST)
From: "Julius Stroffek (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Closed: (DERBY-1434) Client can send incorrect database name
 to server after having made multiple connections to different databases.
In-Reply-To: <6507467.1150926929896.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Julius Stroffek closed DERBY-1434.
----------------------------------


> Client can send incorrect database name to server after having made multiple connections to different databases.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1434
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.2.1.6
>            Reporter: A B
>         Assigned To: Julius Stroffek
>             Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: _driver_1, d1434.java, d1434_v2.java, derby-1434-trunk-diff.txt, derby1434-try2.diff, derby1434-try2.diff, derby1434-try2.stat, derby1434-try3.diff, Server2.trace
>
>
> I have a simple program that connects to a database using the Derby Client, executes a simple query, then connects to a different database using a different Connection object and executes another simple query on that second connection.  The queries both execute without error, so it appears that the connections are correct--i.e. each query will only work on one of the databases, and both queries work, therefore each must be getting executed against the correct database.
> But in looking at the client and server traces, I noticed that for the query on the second database, the client is actually sending the name of the *first* database as RDBNAM, which (I think?) is wrong--it should be sending the name of the second database, since the query is being executed on the second Connection object.
> This behavior does not appear to occur for JCC.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.