Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10717 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2007 19:10:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2007 19:10:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 55297 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 19:11:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55052 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 19:11:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55020 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2007 19:11:01 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:11:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:10:52 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4C6714073 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18019482.1174504232312.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:10:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-827) Performance can be improved by re-using language ResultSets across Activation executions. In-Reply-To: <656578120.1137701442408.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-827: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: d827_execute_method_cleanup.txt d827_execute_cleanup is a patch that cleans up the generation of the execute method and cleans up comments to reflect reality. E.g. that fillResultSet() is required to create a result set, not just an artifact of a code generation limit (which no longer exists anyway). I think this will fix the problem with current_timestamp you are seeing, I've run limited testing on this, will run the complete tests, this can be committed independent of any re-use of ResultSet change, it's basically just cleanup that clarifies how execute & fillResultSet work. > Performance can be improved by re-using language ResultSets across Activation executions. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-827 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-827 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Performance > Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner > Attachments: d827_execute_method_cleanup.txt, derby-827.extra.diff, derby827_draft_reuse_result_sets.txt, derby827_update920.txt, rsfromps.v1.diff, rsfromps.v1.stat, rsfromps_prelim.diff, rsfromps_prelim2.diff > > > >Shouldn't DistinctScalarAggregateRS implement a close or a finish method > >>(not sure what the difference is) and close the scan controller there. > The close() and finish() methods are actually explained in their javadoc > in the language org.apache.derby.iapi.sql.ResultSet class. > [note this is not a JDBC java.sql.ResultSet object] > close() - Tells the system that there will be no more calls to > getNextRow() (until the next open() call) > finish() - Tells the system that there will be no more access to any > database information via this result set > So close means the ResultSet may be opened again for more access, while > finish means it will not be used again. > However, their use in the code always doesn't match that, and that does > cause confusion, at least to me. > Language ResultSets (not JDBC ones) can be and are opened multiple > times, for example when scanning a table multiple times within a join. > An Activation, which represents the internal state of > java.sql.PreparedStatement object & has the lifetime of the > java.sql.PreparedStatement, contains a top-level language ResultSet. > This top-level language ResultSet provides the execution of the SQL > statement, DML, DDL or a query. The top-level ResultSet may contain > other ResultSets and could be seen as a tree structure. For the simple > case of a primary key lookup query like: > select name from customer where id = ? > The activation would contain this: > top result set > ProjectRestrictRS << IndexRowToBaseRowRS << TableScanRS > Now for some reason, even though the api of ResultSet say they can be > re-used, and in some cases they are, this result set tree is thrown away > after each execution. That is, the top result set has its finish() > method called and then the activation removes its reference to it. Then > on the next execution a new (identical) tree is set up. > There is potential for a huge performance gain if this top level result > set and its tree are re-used and have the same lifetime as the > Activation. The saving comes in two forms, not having to create many > objects on each execution, and not creating short-lived objects for the > garbage collector to handle. > I made a simple fix, it's a couple of lines of code, just calling close > & finish at the correct times, and for the above simple primary key > lookup query, the performance went from 17,300 to 24,000 selects per > second (cached data, single user). I'll post a patch shortly as an > indication of the direction, once I can separate it from other changes > in my client. > However, I'm running the Derby tests and there are some (maybe 25-30) > failures, I think because not all the language ResultSet implementations > are correctly written to be re-opened. Interestingly, the first failure > I saw was in an aggregrate test, which goes back to the issue Manish saw. > Even if derbyall passed I would be nervous about submitting this patch > for real, because I don't think there's a lot of testing using repeat > executions of PreparedStatements in the tests. The ij tests mainly use > Statement, this is a single use of an activation so this change would > not affect them. Thus such a patch could regress Derby by making it more > likely existing bugs would be exposed. > Given the performance gains, I think we need to start re-using > ResultSets from Activation, and devise a way to ensure the testing > covers the re-use. The main issue is there is a large number of > ResultSet implementations to cover. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.