Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89660 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2007 18:45:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2007 18:45:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 61723 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2007 18:45:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 61701 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2007 18:45:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 61686 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2007 18:45:38 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:45:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:45:29 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F14271407F for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <14197006.1174070709386.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "A B (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2399) Convert setTransactionIsolation.java to junit In-Reply-To: <8569243.1173126530691.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481727 ] A B commented on DERBY-2399: ---------------------------- > Later the RunTimeStatistics class can be expanded to parse and return other information > as needed for other tests. Does this strategy sound ok? Sounds good to me. I was loosely considering doing something like this for a new test that I'm writing for DERBY-47. In the end I just decided to do a naive string search on the result set stats string to get what I need. But the approach you mention here sounds better. And when/if the work that Felix Beyer did is contributed, the RunTimeStatistics class could be modified appropriately to take advantage of the new functionality. So yes, I like this idea :) > Convert setTransactionIsolation.java to junit > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-2399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2399 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Task > Components: Test > Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0 > Reporter: Kathey Marsden > Assigned To: Kathey Marsden > Fix For: 10.3.0.0 > > Attachments: derbynet.diff, derbynet.stat > > > Convert setTransactionIsolation.java to junit -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.