Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57236 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2007 10:01:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2007 10:01:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 89616 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2007 10:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 89541 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2007 10:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 89512 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2007 10:01:38 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:01:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:01:29 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F65714070 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11446299.1173866469692.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:01:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "V.Narayanan (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2443) Implement ResultSet updateClob/updateBlob methods on the NetworkClient In-Reply-To: <7528037.1173516969275.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12480708 ] V.Narayanan commented on DERBY-2443: ------------------------------------ Thank you for looking at the patch!! >Can't you just remove the if-else block and do the assert, which seems to be common for all cases? The existing code does it that way and I did not disturb it. I just changed the SQLState. However I agree to this and shall make this change in my follow-up patch. >There are also some long lines in client/am/ResultSet. I shall fix these formatting issues in a follow-up patch. > Implement ResultSet updateClob/updateBlob methods on the NetworkClient > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-2443 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2443 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Network Client > Environment: All > Reporter: V.Narayanan > Assigned To: V.Narayanan > Attachments: ResultSetNotImplMethods_v1.diff, ResultSetNotImplMethods_v1.stat > > > Implement the following ResultSet methods on the Network Client > updateBlob(int columnIndex, Blob x) > updateBlob(String columnName, Blob x) > updateClob(int columnIndex, Clob x) > updateClob(String columnName, Clob x) > updateBlob(int columnIndex, InputStream x, long length) > updateBlob(String columnName, InputStream x, long length) > updateClob(int columnIndex, Reader x, long length) > updateClob(String columnName, Reader x, long length) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.