db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Laura Stewart" <scotsmat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Long name of built-in system procedure causes doc problems
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:56:24 GMT
Okay, is it acceptable in places where we are only discussing the
procedure to omit the SYSCS_UTIL. portion of the name?
Clearly in examples that users might copy/paste we would use the full name.

On 3/2/07, Suresh Thalamati <suresh.thalamati@gmail.com> wrote:
> Laura Stewart wrote:
> > Is it possible to change the name of a built-in system procedure?
> > The following procedures cause real problems in the PDF output of the
> > docs because of their really long names:
> > SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_AND_ENABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE
> > SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_AND_ENABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE_NOWAIT
> >
> > Is it possible to shorten the names of these built-in system procedures?
> >
>
> No. First procedure  been there from 10.0 and the second one was added
> in the last 10.2 release.  Changing names can break an existing
> application that depend on them,  so not a good to change them.
>
> Thanks
> -suresh
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Laura Stewart

Mime
View raw message