db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Van Couvering <da...@vancouvering.com>
Subject Re: How to test StorageFactory/StorageFile implementations: help needed
Date Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:05:13 GMT
I thought that you could also do this by modifying 
org/apache/derby/module.properties (as available in your classpath). 
I'm not sure what entry to modify, but this is what is used to identify 
what implementation use for various interfaces (such as StorageFactory).


Francois Orsini wrote:
> Luigi,
> On 3/29/07, *Francois Orsini* <francois.orsini@gmail.com 
> <mailto:francois.orsini@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     Regarding A) You might want to look at some of the proposed and
>     pending changes for in-memory database / storage support:
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-646
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-646>
>     Check the very first comments as a possible way.
> You would probably need to change some of the tests properties to use a 
> different default URL instead (if going the way it is mentioned in 
> JIRA-646 and specify the storage factory to use)...
>     Btw, you might want to create a new JIRA entry (if none already
>     exists) for this new storage factory implementation. Just my 0.02 cents,
> Saw that you're working on 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2469 ;-)  forget the above
>     Regarding B) I guess you could also run the 'multi' (stress) test
>     suite on top of storeall
>     HTH
>     On 3/29/07, *Luigi Lauro* < luigi.lauro@gmail.com
>     <mailto:luigi.lauro@gmail.com>> wrote:
>         By checking the README.htm provided in the SVN testing directory, I
>         can see there is a "storeall" testing suite which seems to test the
>         storage area.
>         Now, given I'm working on a new StorageFactory implementation, I
>         would like to know 2 things:
>         A) How can I enable my storageFactory as default for testing?
>         How can
>         I tell derby to use mine JNLPStorageFactory instead of default one?
>         B) How much can I trust these tests? How much do they stress the
>         StorageFile/StorageFactory implementations? They are 'large enough'
>         so that I can safely trust an implementation if all storeall is
>         passed, or Do i need to provide more, specific test-case in order to
>         be safe of my StorageFactory/StorageFile implementation?
>         Thanks a lot for any help you may give :)

View raw message