db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Matrigali <mikem_...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: Collation implementation WAS Re: Should COLLATION attribute related code go in BasicDatabase?
Date Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:28:18 GMT


Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Mike Matrigali wrote:
> 
>> I think I am missing/not understanding your direction.
>>
>> are there still 4 new types?
> 
> 
> No, collation becomes an attribute of the existing character types just 
> like length and nullability are.
So this means that there will be extra overhead for non locale based
collation.  Is the elimination of this overhead at compile time handled
some way differently in your proposal?
> 
> Dan.
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message