db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2257) Implementing the stored procedures called by the LOB related JDBC methods
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478067

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-2257:

Thanks for addressing my previous comments. Some more questions:
 - In previous versions of the patch the methods in BrokeredConnection forwarded calls to
the underlying connection, but in v6 these methods are empty. Was that an intended change?
 - Should there have been a message for LOB_LOCATOR_INVALID = "XJ217.S" in messages.xml?
 - Some of the test cases test that certain statements fail. Wouldn't it be better if they
used assertSQLState() to make sure the failures are the ones we expect?
 - I think it would be good if the test cases called cs.close().

> Implementing the stored procedures called by the LOB related JDBC methods
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-2257
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2257
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: JDBC
>         Environment: All environments
>            Reporter: V.Narayanan
>         Assigned To: V.Narayanan
>         Attachments: Expln_StoredProc_LOB.txt, Expln_StoredProc_LOB_v2.txt, StoredProcedure_v3.diff,
StoredProcedure_v3.stat, StoredProcedure_v4.diff, StoredProcedure_v4.stat, StoredProcedure_v5.diff,
StoredProcedure_v5.stat, StoredProcedure_v6.diff, StoredProcedure_v6.stat, StoredProcedures_v1.diff,
StoredProcedures_v1.stat, StoredProcedures_v2.diff, StoredProcedures_v2.stat

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message