Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <9551231.1172123525725.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:52:05 -0800 (PST)
From: "V.Narayanan (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2257) Implementing the stored procedures
 called by the LOB related JDBC methods
In-Reply-To: <1552073.1169183310148.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474918 ] 

V.Narayanan commented on DERBY-2257:
------------------------------------

calling the same function in applySafeChanges in DD_Version would help in the creation of the stored procedures during soft upgrade. But I still need more advice on if his is the right thing to do. I will raise a JIRA and put my findings there.


> Implementing the stored procedures called by the LOB related JDBC methods
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2257
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2257
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: JDBC
>         Environment: All environments
>            Reporter: V.Narayanan
>         Assigned To: V.Narayanan
>         Attachments: Expln_StoredProc_LOB.txt, Expln_StoredProc_LOB_v2.txt, StoredProcedures_v1.diff, StoredProcedures_v1.stat, StoredProcedures_v2.diff, StoredProcedures_v2.stat
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.