Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:20:17 -0800
From: Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Q: Should Derby 10.3 be Derby 11?
In-reply-to: <45DDD8F3.6080602@apache.org>
Sender: Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-id: <45DDDEE1.3050901@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <20070220122438.GB4110@atum01.norway.sun.com>
 <45DB6E9A.2050107@sun.com> <45DBE340.1020503@apache.org>
 <45DDC3F4.80509@sun.com> <45DDD1DD.20702@apache.org>
 <45DDD57E.8010505@sun.com> <45DDD8F3.6080602@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828)

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> A wiki page with the proposed backwards compatibility issues 
>>>>> listed together and with definition(s) of secure-by-default would 
>>>>> be good. Since Rick seems to be proposing most of the backwards 
>>>>> compatibility issues he seems like a good candidate to write the 
>>>>> initial version of the page. :-) It could be just the collection 
>>>>> of tables from the various functional specs.
>>>> The 10.3 release page now ends with a section which describes 
>>>> incompatibilities with the previous release: 
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease
>>>
>>> Thanks Rick, from a quick look the DBA powers section doesn't seem 
>>> to match the comments in DERBY-2264 related to requiring 
>>> authentication. But I'm not sure where that stands, (which is why a 
>>> summary is a good thing ;-)
>>>
>>> Dan.
>>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I'm afraid I'm blind this morning. What discrepancy do you see 
>> between the 10.3 incompatibility section and the comments on DERBY-2264?
>
> The DBA powers section on the wiki page makes no mention that this 
> change is only in effect if authentication is enabled.
> This comment in DERBY-2264 seems to say that the restrictions are 
> enforced when authentication is enabled.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2264#action_12474538
>
> Dan.
>
Thanks, Dan. I have updated the wiki page to clarify that the 
restrictions depend on authentication.

Regards,
-Rick